Cats and Other Strays

This weekend a young cat abandoned her two newborn kittens under our house.

We are not cat people. Or at least, we are not stray-cat people. I have had pet cats, but I have no emotional attachment to stray cats, which are wild animals of an invasive species. ((And which, not “belonging to” anyone, may lawfully be humanely killed.)) Our neighborhood is overrun with the vermin, which slaughter the birdlife and shit in the flower beds. I have on many occasions trapped neighborhood strays and taken them to the pound. I have surely caused the deaths of several of those strays, but lost no sleep over it.

I know the theory: you shouldn’t euthanize strays but rather TNR—Trap, Neuter, and Release—because neutering the cats and returning them to the colony will result in the diminution of the colony over time. But I don’t believe it. Cat lovers in the Houston Heights trapped, neutered, and returned all the cats they could last year, and still we have cat teen moms ditching their unwanted children. TNR is failing in the Heights.

The theory behind TNR is that “whenever cats are removed, new cats move in, or the surviving cats left behind, breed to capacity.” My theory of why TNR isn’t working in the Heights is that cat lovers, by feeding cat colonies, increase the neighborhood’s capacity for cats beyond what nature has provided and what cat lovers can manage. The more food you put out, the more the unfixed cats will breed to fill that capacity. The greater the capacity, the more cats. The more cats, the more will get missed in the neutering efforts. The more unneutered cats, the more litters.

Stop feeding the cats, and they’ll reach a much smaller population equilibrium. ((Maybe even one that doesn’t have me baiting the Havahart.)) Feed the cats, on the other hand, and you are ethically responsible for them. If you care about the cats (which, if you feed the cats, you probably do), then you are also obligated to TNR them. ((As does the law.))

Feed the cats and fail to TNR them, and you are responsible for their offspring.

So. Two kittens, abandoned by young mama cat who had no idea what to do with them: nature did not intend that these survive. They’d have been easy pickings for the red-tailed hawks that we’re sometimes fortunate to see in the neighborhood. But instead of letting natural selection do its job, we boxed them up and took them to the cat lady down on the corner, one of several who feed the neighborhood strays. When we explained that our alternative was to leave the box on the curb and hope somebody would come pick it up, she complained about all the time and money she had spent on her cat colony, but grudgingly took the two rat-sized kittens off our hands.

And then, at about midnight, ((When I get a cross email sent in the wee hours, I assume that alcohol was involved.)) she rattled off a cross email to me, CC all of her friends:

I just want you to know I feel about the kitten incident. I am still sitting outside crying and unable to sleep.  You took advantage of someone who obviously cannot let you “leave the kittens on the corner.”  I feed the feral cats as one small part of all I can do. I trap them and get them fixed. I spend inordinate amounts of money on trying to help animals and my heart breaks everyday. It is pathetic that this city has 1.2 million stray dogs and god knows how many cats. … I spent the rest of my day taking the kittens to Sunset Blvd Animal Clinic, I made two trips to Petsmart to get what they needed, and my vet at Greenway Animal Clinic is going to get them into a rescue program tomorrow at my expense. They still had umbilical cords attached and had maggot eggs on them. I hope you can do something more responsible in the future and not thrust responsibility on people who can’t say no.  Please contact [vet] at 713-xxx-xxxx at Greenway Animal Clinic if I am out of town or me at 713-xxx-xxxx or 713-xxx-xxxx if you find more kittens or the mother so we can do something since you obviously will not.

Thanks to Rule One, I have resisted responding to her, but things worked efficiently here: people who had little interest in the survival of these cats delivered them to someone who obviously had great interest in it.

As a result, the cats get a chance to live without passing on their mother’s defective kitten-abandoning genes. The cat lady gets whatever psychic value she so obviously finds in saving stray cats and, as a bonus unforeseen to me, gets to play the martyr among her friends. ((Never underestimate the value of this in our narcissistic victimocratic society.)) I get the cats out of my front yard, the pleasure of having saved a living thing, ((A verminous living thing, granted, but still.)) the satisfaction of having given the cat lady what she wanted, ((Though she complains about it.)) and a blog post.

I’m not saying this is the only or even the most efficient result: had a hawk or a raccoon snacked on the kittens, things would also have worked efficiently—better for the predator, worse for the kittens and cat lady—but I probably wouldn’t have gotten a blog post out of it.

Meanwhile, back in the federal courthouse…

Thanks to the sequester the government has cut funding for Federal Public Defenders’ Offices, resulting in layoffs, and cut the already-low rates paid private lawyers appointed to represent indigent people in federal court (Criminal Justice Act, or CJA rates).

The more rational solution would appear to be to cut back on prosecutions, since defense expenses follow prosecution expenses.

But the criminal-defense bar, like the cat lady, gets psychic value from doing what it does. ((My first thought when the cat lady complained about her money and time spent helping stray cats was, “what a waste.” But I probably spend more time and money helping stray human beings, and who knows: maybe cats are more worthy of saving than human beings. It’s easier to see results when you’re helping cats.)) Even though CJA rates were already below market rates for good lawyers, good lawyers took appointments in federal court because it provided other satisfactions, among them the pleasure of helping those whom God had forsaken, society’s strays.

I believe, as a matter of principle, in calling bluffs. Criminal-defense lawyers ought to quit the CJA panel en masse, because gutting the defense to preserve the prosecution is wrong, and because the only way for the lawyers to keep the government from cutting their pay and laying off PDs is by refusing to accept it. If the government wants to prosecute people, it must pay to defend them; if it’s not willing to do so it should be forced to forgo prosecution.

But that will never happen. Because of the fringe benefits, ((As well as a lack of political will among criminal-defense lawyers.)) the government will get away with cutting CJA rates, and there will not be mass resignations from the CJA panel.

There are plenty of strays I can help without being appointed to help them, so I am resigning from the CJA list. But the CJA bar as a whole will not say “no” to continuing to help the strays despite the feeling that they are being treated unjustly.

Most of them won’t send alcohol-fueled midnight emails complaining about the injustice of being forced to do what they have chosen to do. Now that the government has gotten away with cutting CJA rates, it’ll do it every time the opportunity presents itself, and the lawyers have nobody to blame but themselves.

17 responses to “Cats and Other Strays”

  1. You’ve had pet cats? Have you had one since the “flat cat” incident which occurred thirty years ago?

    Luckily, none of your regular readers or commenters are likely to be cat people so this post will hardly be noticed.

  2. Hmm, I’ll take cats over rats any day. And the lady (calling her a cat lady is equal to calling lawyers dogs and sharks, while some are, most aren’t) would best be served with a polite reply thanking her with a link to Feral Friends.

    Regarding animals, animal people & inmates: You did (and do) the right thing(s) for the right reasons vs. it being an in house motto of dogs & sharks of decades past and you know it. If you didn’t I’d be the first to say so. Gotta love a real CDL with a beating heart.

  3. Next time, pick up a small piece of dry ice at the grocery store, and drop the critters in a sealed box or cooler with the DI.
    It kills them fast with little mess.
    Obey all local and state laws, though.

    • Thanks for the tip. It sounds humane, though I think CO or He might be even better than CO2.

      If you suffocate on CO or He, apparently you don’t even know it—the lights just go out.

      • Carbon dioxide is just fine. At about 5-10 percent, it induces mild narcosis. At 30%, unconsciousness; and full-strength, death.

        Don’t go to 100% right away, it’s irritating to the respiratory tract. And leave them in it for at least 30 minutes.

        You don’t even need dry ice; get a cylinder from a welding shop, or make it with acid and sodium bicarb (baking soda). Vinegar will do; pool acid too, though dilute it to about 5%.

        CO2 is used as a euthenasia agent for lab animals and wildlife.

        It’s heavier than air, so any solid plastic container will do.

  4. What a cruel person you are, how heartless, and without compassion. I came across you while researching my own writing, and in someway hope to educate people in being responsible for their outside cats, to get them spayed or neutered. It breaks my heart, and makes me quite sick to see this post. You would be better to not defend people, and in turn put the blame where it belongs, and that is on people that are not responsible for their own pets. A stray didn’t choose his lot in life, he or she was put there by people. They are lost, or abandoned, and the offspring of the abandoned. They may be someone’s pet that got out, or their outside cat. My cat is an inside cat, but how tragic for any cat out there that may come across the path of what I’ve seen here.

    • A collarless cat that spends its nights outside is not someone’s “outside” pet. It’s a stray, a member of an invasive and destructive species. That you gave it a name and it deigns to be petted by you does not make it your pet.

      I don’t put the blame for the plague of strays on the cats. I put it on you.

      You who feed strays—especially if you feed them without ensuring that every one is neutered or spayed—are responsible for the cats and their offspring. You think that feeding strays is a kindness; this is a juvenile assumption. By feeding strays you ensure overpopulation. They will devastate the indigenous wildlife and spread disease, and when the time comes for these strays to die of injuries or illness (both made more likely by overpopulation), they won’t get the final boon that pets receive of drifting off to their final rest in the arms of those who love them. Instead, they’ll crawl off to die.

      Euthanasia is by far the greater kindness.

      Meanwhile there are human beings who need compassion, so you’ll forgive me for not spending any more time on those who, having been disappointed one time too many by people (sound familiar?), substitute the feeding of strays for activities that will make the world a better place.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.