There are dangerous pedophiles in the world, and some of them are civil lawyers. But that is no reason to assume that Dallas lawyer Robert J. Davis is either a pedophile or dangerous.
Because assuming that a civil lawyer like Robert J. Davis is a dangerous pedophile would be like assuming that a criminal lawyer is in cahoots with dangerous drug dealers.
And I wouldn’t do that. Most civil lawyers are not dangerous pedophiles, so if I had to take a position on the question I would be comfortable saying this: Robert J. Davis is neither dangerous nor a pedophile.
In that way I’m unlike Robert J. Davis, who wrote in a letter to the Attorney General:
It is self-evident that the release of Investigator Meehan’s personnel file to an attorney who represents alleged drug dealers could pose a threat to Investigator Meehan and his family’s personal safety and well being.
It’s probably several orders of magnitude more likely that a randomly chosen civil lawyer will diddle children than that a randomly chosen criminal-defense lawyer will reveal an officer’s information to people who would pose a danger to that officer.
But still, trust Robert J. Davis with your kids if you want to. I’m sure it’ll be okay.
5 responses to “2015.6: Dallas Lawyer Robert J. Davis”
RT @MarkWBennett: New Defending People blog post: 2015.6: Dallas Lawyer Robert J. Davis http://t.co/RPeHj1hT0O
Why won’t Dallas lawyer Robert J. Davis answer the question? Is he a dangerous pedophile?
I assume there is a fascinating story that goes along with this, and would really like to know what it is. A link perhaps? A few details of the backstory? Anything?
[…] Greenfield wants the backstory? Here’s the […]
Ten points for style . . .