2015.30: For Shame, Professor Franks.


A wise man recently said, “If you publicly oppose criminalization of anything, zealots of criminalization will accuse you of favoring that thing.”

The argument is either ignorant or dishonest. Franks doesn’t get to plead ignorance here. She knows the argument is dishonest and she makes it anyway.

It is fair to ask, “is there some depth to which Mary Anne Franks won’t sink?” So far we haven’t found that depth.


5 responses to “2015.30: For Shame, Professor Franks.”

  1. Too true. Just like asking for due process for someone accused of rape is now considered to be sanctioning rape.

  2. “is there some depth to which Mary Anne Franks won’t sink?”

    The evidence is mixed. So far as we know, she has not killed any kittens in promoting her ill-advised revenge porn bill. The problem is that she has not come out against kitten-killing, and so I guess we have to supply the facts via presumption.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.